Окончательное размежевание России и Израиля. … Небензя (постпред России в ООН) на заседании Совбеза сегодня ночью: расцениваем случившееся, как террористический акт. … Это о массовых взрывах пейджеров. … Конечно, этой позицией Россия получает огромную поддержку среди мусульманских стран. Однако, власти этих стран не готовы действовать.
Окончательное размежевание России и Израиля. … Небензя (постпред России в ООН) на заседании Совбеза сегодня ночью: расцениваем случившееся, как террористический акт. … Это о массовых взрывах пейджеров. … Конечно, этой позицией Россия получает огромную поддержку среди мусульманских стран. Однако, власти этих стран не готовы действовать.
BY Политджойстик / Politjoystic ™
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. In February 2014, the Ukrainian people ousted pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych, prompting Russia to invade and annex the Crimean peninsula. By the start of April, Pavel Durov had given his notice, with TechCrunch saying at the time that the CEO had resisted pressure to suppress pages criticizing the Russian government. The picture was mixed overseas. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index fell 1.6%, under pressure from U.S. regulatory scrutiny on New York-listed Chinese companies. Stocks were more buoyant in Europe, where Frankfurt’s DAX surged 1.4%.
from pl