📊Рейтинг российских политконсультантов в 2024 году
📍Топ-20 федеральных политконсультантов
1. Костин Константин / 17,3 2. Табак Владимир / 16,8 3. Алиев Фирдус / 16,5 4. Казанков Григорий / 16,2 5. Гнатюк Андрей / 15,7 6. Комиссаров Алексей / 15,4 7. Карпилов Олег / 15,3 8. Саркисов Вартан / 15,1 9. Федоров Валерий / 14,7 10. Орлов Дмитрий / 14,3
11. Зверев Сергей / 13,9 12. Чеснаков Алексей / 13,8 13. Гореславский Алексей / 13,7 14. Гращенков Илья / 13,3 15. Чадаев Алексей / 13,2 16. Михайлов Сергей / 13,0 17. Минченко Евгений / 12,7 18. Быстров Петр / 12,6 19. Максимов Андрей / 12,4 20. Игнатовский Ярослав / 12,2
📊Рейтинг российских политконсультантов в 2024 году
📍Топ-20 федеральных политконсультантов
1. Костин Константин / 17,3 2. Табак Владимир / 16,8 3. Алиев Фирдус / 16,5 4. Казанков Григорий / 16,2 5. Гнатюк Андрей / 15,7 6. Комиссаров Алексей / 15,4 7. Карпилов Олег / 15,3 8. Саркисов Вартан / 15,1 9. Федоров Валерий / 14,7 10. Орлов Дмитрий / 14,3
11. Зверев Сергей / 13,9 12. Чеснаков Алексей / 13,8 13. Гореславский Алексей / 13,7 14. Гращенков Илья / 13,3 15. Чадаев Алексей / 13,2 16. Михайлов Сергей / 13,0 17. Минченко Евгений / 12,7 18. Быстров Петр / 12,6 19. Максимов Андрей / 12,4 20. Игнатовский Ярослав / 12,2
#Рейтинг
BY Политтехнологи
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
False news often spreads via public groups, or chats, with potentially fatal effects. The channel appears to be part of the broader information war that has developed following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The Kremlin has paid Russian TikTok influencers to push propaganda, according to a Vice News investigation, while ProPublica found that fake Russian fact check videos had been viewed over a million times on Telegram. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content.
from pl
