Собрали 2️⃣0️⃣9️⃣0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣ из 3️⃣6️⃣3️⃣0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣ на РЭБ ДЛЯ БОЛОТОХОДА ДЛЯ #вежливыелюди на 18:53
Мы продолжаем !
Нельзя останавливать сборы! Наши ждут помощи !!!
На первый болотоход необходимо собрать 363 000 руб. для полного комплекта защиты "Ромашка 4.2": • Блок А- 135000 • Блок Б - 149000 • 2 АКБ 24/100ah - 33000 за шт • Спектроанализатор - 13000
Вместе мы сделаем наших ребят неуязвимыми🙏
Каждая ваша копейка - это броня для наших защитников! Спасибо за вашу поддержку!💪🇷🇺
Собрали 2️⃣0️⃣9️⃣0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣ из 3️⃣6️⃣3️⃣0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣ на РЭБ ДЛЯ БОЛОТОХОДА ДЛЯ #вежливыелюди на 18:53
Мы продолжаем !
Нельзя останавливать сборы! Наши ждут помощи !!!
На первый болотоход необходимо собрать 363 000 руб. для полного комплекта защиты "Ромашка 4.2": • Блок А- 135000 • Блок Б - 149000 • 2 АКБ 24/100ah - 33000 за шт • Спектроанализатор - 13000
Вместе мы сделаем наших ребят неуязвимыми🙏
Каждая ваша копейка - это броня для наших защитников! Спасибо за вашу поддержку!💪🇷🇺
Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from pl
