В Словакии свыше 361 тысячи человек подписали петицию об отмене санкций ЕС против России, что больше необходимого числа подписей для проведения референдума в стране, — представитель словацкого гражданского объединения "Брат за Брата" Юрай Држик. Држик отметил, что в январе планируется передача собранных подписей президенту страны.
В Словакии свыше 361 тысячи человек подписали петицию об отмене санкций ЕС против России, что больше необходимого числа подписей для проведения референдума в стране, — представитель словацкого гражданского объединения "Брат за Брата" Юрай Држик. Држик отметил, что в январе планируется передача собранных подписей президенту страны.
BY Импорт в Россию
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
The gold standard of encryption, known as end-to-end encryption, where only the sender and person who receives the message are able to see it, is available on Telegram only when the Secret Chat function is enabled. Voice and video calls are also completely encrypted. On Telegram’s website, it says that Pavel Durov “supports Telegram financially and ideologically while Nikolai (Duvov)’s input is technological.” Currently, the Telegram team is based in Dubai, having moved around from Berlin, London and Singapore after departing Russia. Meanwhile, the company which owns Telegram is registered in the British Virgin Islands. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said in a video message on Tuesday that Ukrainian forces "destroy the invaders wherever we can." Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from pl
