Журналист Сергей Пархоменко в эфире Breakfast show подтвердил, что подписал письмо с просьбой о снятии санкций с руководства «Альфа-групп» (Михаила Фридмана, Петра Авена и др.).
Пархоменко пояснил, что подписывал отдельный лист, после чего его подпись была скопирована в общий бланк, в чем он не видит ничего ненормального.
Напомним, Леонид Волков заявил, что его подпись в письме была «вфотошоплена», а само опубликованное Алексеем Венедиктовым письмо он не подписывал. При этом подписывал ли он отдельный идентичный бланк, политик не уточнил. По данным «Соты», его подпись была ключевой для ряда других людей, поддержавших документ вслед за ним.
Журналист Сергей Пархоменко в эфире Breakfast show подтвердил, что подписал письмо с просьбой о снятии санкций с руководства «Альфа-групп» (Михаила Фридмана, Петра Авена и др.).
Пархоменко пояснил, что подписывал отдельный лист, после чего его подпись была скопирована в общий бланк, в чем он не видит ничего ненормального.
Напомним, Леонид Волков заявил, что его подпись в письме была «вфотошоплена», а само опубликованное Алексеем Венедиктовым письмо он не подписывал. При этом подписывал ли он отдельный идентичный бланк, политик не уточнил. По данным «Соты», его подпись была ключевой для ряда других людей, поддержавших документ вслед за ним.
The original Telegram channel has expanded into a web of accounts for different locations, including specific pages made for individual Russian cities. There's also an English-language website, which states it is owned by the people who run the Telegram channels. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from pl
