Я рассказывала вам, что подавала заявку на регистрацию моейстраницы VK. Там почти 12,8 тыс. подписчиков, и в соответствии с законом сообщество должно быть зарегистрировано.
🔤➕ Роскомнадзор одобрил заявку, и на моей странице появилась информация о том, что ресурс включён в перечень ведомства.
Я рассказывала вам, что подавала заявку на регистрацию моейстраницы VK. Там почти 12,8 тыс. подписчиков, и в соответствии с законом сообщество должно быть зарегистрировано.
🔤➕ Роскомнадзор одобрил заявку, и на моей странице появилась информация о том, что ресурс включён в перечень ведомства.
One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. The original Telegram channel has expanded into a web of accounts for different locations, including specific pages made for individual Russian cities. There's also an English-language website, which states it is owned by the people who run the Telegram channels. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from pl
