To my great sorrow, Sverigedemokraterna (SD – Sweden Democrats) have a hard time implementing positive change in the parliament.
They have to contend with anti-Swedish agents of the regime (Liberalerna – the “Liberals”, for example) that they are supposedly in a coalition with. Add to this their actual opponents (Social Democrats, primarily).
Many obstacles for sure.
However, being the second largest party in Sweden, they definitely have the capacity to impose positive change – were it not for a lack of will.
There are, of course, some in SD with courage and will galore. But we need more of them in the party.
Thus, I repeat my previous recommendation – we need to get more driven individuals (with a good moral compass – i.e. those who put Sweden and the Swedes first) into political parties (SD in particular).
The good individuals in SD need reinforcements.
Even during this “Conservative” government, citizenships have been handed out en masse to non-Europeans (sure votes for the Social Democrats in the upcoming election).
So their passivity in this regard (i.e. not closing the borders and not revoking citizenships) has, I am afraid, lost them the coming election.
We still have time, but not so much time that we can afford be lazy.
To my great sorrow, Sverigedemokraterna (SD – Sweden Democrats) have a hard time implementing positive change in the parliament.
They have to contend with anti-Swedish agents of the regime (Liberalerna – the “Liberals”, for example) that they are supposedly in a coalition with. Add to this their actual opponents (Social Democrats, primarily).
Many obstacles for sure.
However, being the second largest party in Sweden, they definitely have the capacity to impose positive change – were it not for a lack of will.
There are, of course, some in SD with courage and will galore. But we need more of them in the party.
Thus, I repeat my previous recommendation – we need to get more driven individuals (with a good moral compass – i.e. those who put Sweden and the Swedes first) into political parties (SD in particular).
The good individuals in SD need reinforcements.
Even during this “Conservative” government, citizenships have been handed out en masse to non-Europeans (sure votes for the Social Democrats in the upcoming election).
So their passivity in this regard (i.e. not closing the borders and not revoking citizenships) has, I am afraid, lost them the coming election.
We still have time, but not so much time that we can afford be lazy.
The last couple days have exemplified that uncertainty. On Thursday, news emerged that talks in Turkey between the Russia and Ukraine yielded no positive result. But on Friday, Reuters reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin said there had been some “positive shifts” in talks between the two sides. Following this, Sebi, in an order passed in January 2022, established that the administrators of a Telegram channel having a large subscriber base enticed the subscribers to act upon recommendations that were circulated by those administrators on the channel, leading to significant price and volume impact in various scrips. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. In the past, it was noticed that through bulk SMSes, investors were induced to invest in or purchase the stocks of certain listed companies. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from pl
