Канал же называется Сашины методы. Кому таргетолог пишет фамилию из двух штук?
Для кого это важно, кроме её носительницы? Только честно.
Ни для кого. Всем похрен. Будь она хоть Гомберг-Дьяконова, это в нынешнее время, увы, никому неинтересно. Тем более в объявлении для TG Ads.
Ну на МИФ как-то книга была, давно. Кого-то обучает. Но, блин, серьёзно? Это повод вставлять фамилию в крео? В те самые 160 символов, которые важны прежде всего?
😮 – она на аватарке в чёрном. точно знаменитость 👿 – кто такая Гомберг-Дьяконова?!
Канал же называется Сашины методы. Кому таргетолог пишет фамилию из двух штук?
Для кого это важно, кроме её носительницы? Только честно.
Ни для кого. Всем похрен. Будь она хоть Гомберг-Дьяконова, это в нынешнее время, увы, никому неинтересно. Тем более в объявлении для TG Ads.
Ну на МИФ как-то книга была, давно. Кого-то обучает. Но, блин, серьёзно? Это повод вставлять фамилию в крео? В те самые 160 символов, которые важны прежде всего?
😮 – она на аватарке в чёрном. точно знаменитость 👿 – кто такая Гомберг-Дьяконова?!
The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives?
from pl
