Тем временем украинский телемарафон был взломан российскими хакерами и по всем телеканалам запущено предупреждение о скором ударе "Орешником".
Если это не то самое предупреждение мирных жителей, которое ранее анонсировал Владимир Путин, то цель таких пугалок, осуществляемых на фоне постоянных намеков о повторном ударе "Орешником" без его реального практического применения, нам не ясна-Военный Осведомитель.
Тем временем украинский телемарафон был взломан российскими хакерами и по всем телеканалам запущено предупреждение о скором ударе "Орешником".
Если это не то самое предупреждение мирных жителей, которое ранее анонсировал Владимир Путин, то цель таких пугалок, осуществляемых на фоне постоянных намеков о повторном ударе "Орешником" без его реального практического применения, нам не ясна-Военный Осведомитель.
BY ЮРЕВЕРЮ
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into."
from pl
