💢دانشجویانی که از طرف دانشگاه (زنجان) قصد ثبت نام در این دوره را دارند تا تاریخ ۲ مهر میتوانند از تخفیف استفاده کنند و با پرداخت 180,000 هزار تومان در این دوره شرکت کنند
💢دانشجویانی که از طرف دانشگاه (زنجان) قصد ثبت نام در این دوره را دارند تا تاریخ ۲ مهر میتوانند از تخفیف استفاده کنند و با پرداخت 180,000 هزار تومان در این دوره شرکت کنند
BY انجمن علمی مهندسی مواد و متالورژی دانشگاه زنجان
A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." The last couple days have exemplified that uncertainty. On Thursday, news emerged that talks in Turkey between the Russia and Ukraine yielded no positive result. But on Friday, Reuters reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin said there had been some “positive shifts” in talks between the two sides. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today."
from pl
