✅ Это то, что я брал в свои две командировки. Конечно если есть возможность лучше взять свое, потому что не факт, что вам выдадут то что необходимо. Некоторые скажут, что это должна выдавать армия. Так точно должна, но как показывает практика, вам могут выдать шлем стальной времён великой отечественной войны и бронежилет третьего класса. Поэтому если есть такая возможность – лучше приобрести свое родное, что точно вас не подведёт в бою. Расчитывать надо только на себя!
✅ Это то, что я брал в свои две командировки. Конечно если есть возможность лучше взять свое, потому что не факт, что вам выдадут то что необходимо. Некоторые скажут, что это должна выдавать армия. Так точно должна, но как показывает практика, вам могут выдать шлем стальной времён великой отечественной войны и бронежилет третьего класса. Поэтому если есть такая возможность – лучше приобрести свое родное, что точно вас не подведёт в бою. Расчитывать надо только на себя!
Artem Kliuchnikov and his family fled Ukraine just days before the Russian invasion. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. In February 2014, the Ukrainian people ousted pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych, prompting Russia to invade and annex the Crimean peninsula. By the start of April, Pavel Durov had given his notice, with TechCrunch saying at the time that the CEO had resisted pressure to suppress pages criticizing the Russian government.
from pl
