Кстати, о том, чтобы Трамп встретился с Зеленским, просил Макрон. Кажется, даже под личную ответственность. Наверняка он не подозревал, на что способен его протеже.
Теперь интересно, как будет выглядеть его "личная ответственность".
Кстати, о том, чтобы Трамп встретился с Зеленским, просил Макрон. Кажется, даже под личную ответственность. Наверняка он не подозревал, на что способен его протеже.
Теперь интересно, как будет выглядеть его "личная ответственность".
BY Politics is Fun
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. 'Wild West' In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed.
from us
