Когда таких игроков как Медведчук снова выходят из тени должен возникнуть простой вопрос, а зачем нам это сейчас показывают?
Ответ может скрываться в намерении Кремля перевести конфликт на Украине из военной во внутриполитическую плоскость. Также это может говорить о возможности проведения выборов на Украине, но они возможны только после отмены военного положения. По крайней мере так предписывает их законодательство.
Когда таких игроков как Медведчук снова выходят из тени должен возникнуть простой вопрос, а зачем нам это сейчас показывают?
Ответ может скрываться в намерении Кремля перевести конфликт на Украине из военной во внутриполитическую плоскость. Также это может говорить о возможности проведения выборов на Украине, но они возможны только после отмены военного положения. По крайней мере так предписывает их законодательство.
During the operations, Sebi officials seized various records and documents, including 34 mobile phones, six laptops, four desktops, four tablets, two hard drive disks and one pen drive from the custody of these persons. "There is a significant risk of insider threat or hacking of Telegram systems that could expose all of these chats to the Russian government," said Eva Galperin with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which has called for Telegram to improve its privacy practices. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. What distinguishes the app from competitors is its use of what's known as channels: Public or private feeds of photos and videos that can be set up by one person or an organization. The channels have become popular with on-the-ground journalists, aid workers and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who broadcasts on a Telegram channel. The channels can be followed by an unlimited number of people. Unlike Facebook, Twitter and other popular social networks, there is no advertising on Telegram and the flow of information is not driven by an algorithm. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from us
