«Законы, криминализирующие гендерное насилие, — жестокий обман, поскольку они не учитывают структурный сексизм и расизм в системах уголовного правосудия, не критикуют жестокость полиции, массовые аресты, «угрозы депортации, военные интервенции, харассмент и абьюзивные отношения на рабочем месте. Наконец, юридическая эмансипация остаётся пустым звуком, если не включает в себя социальные услуги, безопасное жильё и финансовую помощь женщинам, которые хотят вырваться из плена насилия в семье или на работе».
«Законы, криминализирующие гендерное насилие, — жестокий обман, поскольку они не учитывают структурный сексизм и расизм в системах уголовного правосудия, не критикуют жестокость полиции, массовые аресты, «угрозы депортации, военные интервенции, харассмент и абьюзивные отношения на рабочем месте. Наконец, юридическая эмансипация остаётся пустым звуком, если не включает в себя социальные услуги, безопасное жильё и финансовую помощь женщинам, которые хотят вырваться из плена насилия в семье или на работе».
The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." In 2018, Russia banned Telegram although it reversed the prohibition two years later.
from us