🔺آیا این نگاهی که به قرآن داریم درست است؟ 🔺شیطان که خدا و قیامت را قبول دارد، پس چرا رانده شد؟ 🔺شباهت ماجرای حضرت هارون و حضرت علی علیهما السلام چیست؟ 🔺سامری چطور فتنه کرد؟
🔺آیا این نگاهی که به قرآن داریم درست است؟ 🔺شیطان که خدا و قیامت را قبول دارد، پس چرا رانده شد؟ 🔺شباهت ماجرای حضرت هارون و حضرت علی علیهما السلام چیست؟ 🔺سامری چطور فتنه کرد؟
You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. Official government accounts have also spread fake fact checks. An official Twitter account for the Russia diplomatic mission in Geneva shared a fake debunking video claiming without evidence that "Western and Ukrainian media are creating thousands of fake news on Russia every day." The video, which has amassed almost 30,000 views, offered a "how-to" spot misinformation. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried.
from ru