Наблюдая нарастающий вал фотографий полуголой брайтонской женщины, осмелюсь заметить, что помимо неё кандидаток в пресс-секретари большая очередь, да и у администрации Трампа в принципе не может быть пресс-секретаря, потому что и администрации пока такой нет. До инаугурации надо ещё дожить…
Наблюдая нарастающий вал фотографий полуголой брайтонской женщины, осмелюсь заметить, что помимо неё кандидаток в пресс-секретари большая очередь, да и у администрации Трампа в принципе не может быть пресс-секретаря, потому что и администрации пока такой нет. До инаугурации надо ещё дожить…
BY С берега Гудзона
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. In 2018, Russia banned Telegram although it reversed the prohibition two years later. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. The last couple days have exemplified that uncertainty. On Thursday, news emerged that talks in Turkey between the Russia and Ukraine yielded no positive result. But on Friday, Reuters reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin said there had been some “positive shifts” in talks between the two sides.
from ru
