Знакомый генерал ЗСУ рассказал, что сегодня он не выходил из дома боясь быть убитым. Просто Шарий во всех своих телеграмм каналах не написал не одного поста про неминуемый ответ России, а значит скоро всю верхушку ЗСУ просто уничтожат или по Банковой прилетят днём сразу два Орешника или взорвут весь правительственный квартал в Киеве. Просто уже все знают, что пророчества Шария сбываются, но наоборот.
Знакомый генерал ЗСУ рассказал, что сегодня он не выходил из дома боясь быть убитым. Просто Шарий во всех своих телеграмм каналах не написал не одного поста про неминуемый ответ России, а значит скоро всю верхушку ЗСУ просто уничтожат или по Банковой прилетят днём сразу два Орешника или взорвут весь правительственный квартал в Киеве. Просто уже все знают, что пророчества Шария сбываются, но наоборот.
BY Записки Панаса Шевченко 🇺🇦🇪🇺
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. In 2014, Pavel Durov fled the country after allies of the Kremlin took control of the social networking site most know just as VK. Russia's intelligence agency had asked Durov to turn over the data of anti-Kremlin protesters. Durov refused to do so. The original Telegram channel has expanded into a web of accounts for different locations, including specific pages made for individual Russian cities. There's also an English-language website, which states it is owned by the people who run the Telegram channels. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts.
from ru
