Новая модель от XAI на уровне Claude 3.5 и GPT-4. Последнюю неделю её можно было потрогать на арене под именем sus-column-r.
Grok 2 уже доступен пользователям X Premium, вместе с генератором изображений на основе FLUX.1 от моих корешей из Black Forest Labs.
Модель пока поддерживает только текст, но мультимодальность обещают уже скоро. API будет доступен через несколько недель. Всё по EST (Elon Standard Time), так что может задержаться. Напоминаю что Grok 1.5 так и не релизнули.
А Grok 3 уже тренируется на новом кластере XAI, ждём.
Новая модель от XAI на уровне Claude 3.5 и GPT-4. Последнюю неделю её можно было потрогать на арене под именем sus-column-r.
Grok 2 уже доступен пользователям X Premium, вместе с генератором изображений на основе FLUX.1 от моих корешей из Black Forest Labs.
Модель пока поддерживает только текст, но мультимодальность обещают уже скоро. API будет доступен через несколько недель. Всё по EST (Elon Standard Time), так что может задержаться. Напоминаю что Grok 1.5 так и не релизнули.
А Grok 3 уже тренируется на новом кластере XAI, ждём.
The original Telegram channel has expanded into a web of accounts for different locations, including specific pages made for individual Russian cities. There's also an English-language website, which states it is owned by the people who run the Telegram channels. Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice.
from ru
