Telegram Group & Telegram Channel
Интересная инфографика по прошедшим дебатам кандидатов в вице-президенты от The NYT

1 картинка: Критика оппонента

Уолз посвятил критике оппонента всего 9 минут и 19 секунд. Из них 1:21 ушла на критику Вэнса. Трампа Уолз критиковал почти 8 минут.

Вэнс посвятил критике оппонента 8 минут и 14 секунд. На критику Уолза ушло 2:43. На Харрис — 5:30.

2 картинка: Основные темы

Больше всего оба кандидата атаковали друг друга по вопросам, связанным миграцией. В общем: 9 минут и 10 секунд.

(ИМХО, спор о миграционных проблемах — самый «жаркий» момент прошедших дебатов)

Для Вэнса главными темами для критики Харрис и Уолза были экономика и иммиграция.

Уолз же решил строить свою критику Трампа и Вэнса на вопросах, связанных с абортами, соцсферой в целом и демократическим процессом.

#ДебатыСША #ВыборыСША2024

Подписаться на Записки американиста🐘



group-telegram.com/alexander_kynev/9467
Create:
Last Update:

Интересная инфографика по прошедшим дебатам кандидатов в вице-президенты от The NYT

1 картинка: Критика оппонента

Уолз посвятил критике оппонента всего 9 минут и 19 секунд. Из них 1:21 ушла на критику Вэнса. Трампа Уолз критиковал почти 8 минут.

Вэнс посвятил критике оппонента 8 минут и 14 секунд. На критику Уолза ушло 2:43. На Харрис — 5:30.

2 картинка: Основные темы

Больше всего оба кандидата атаковали друг друга по вопросам, связанным миграцией. В общем: 9 минут и 10 секунд.

(ИМХО, спор о миграционных проблемах — самый «жаркий» момент прошедших дебатов)

Для Вэнса главными темами для критики Харрис и Уолза были экономика и иммиграция.

Уолз же решил строить свою критику Трампа и Вэнса на вопросах, связанных с абортами, соцсферой в целом и демократическим процессом.

#ДебатыСША #ВыборыСША2024

Подписаться на Записки американиста🐘

BY Kynev





Share with your friend now:
group-telegram.com/alexander_kynev/9467

View MORE
Open in Telegram


Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: |

Perpetrators of these scams will create a public group on Telegram to promote these investment packages that are usually accompanied by fake testimonies and sometimes advertised as being Shariah-compliant. Interested investors will be asked to directly message the representatives to begin investing in the various investment packages offered. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups.
from ru


Telegram Kynev
FROM American