Знаете, что выдали на этот раз чубатые?? Оказывается наш, советский мультфильм "Простоквашино" пропагандирует .... минуточку внимания... Украину🤦♂️ Оказывается во всём мультике хохлы высмотрели флаги Украины, а юный бандеровец дядя Фёдор сбежал от своего отца имперца!👀
Хохлы, ну Вы и уроды... такую чушь нести про наше Ппостоквашино!🤬
Знаете, что выдали на этот раз чубатые?? Оказывается наш, советский мультфильм "Простоквашино" пропагандирует .... минуточку внимания... Украину🤦♂️ Оказывается во всём мультике хохлы высмотрели флаги Украины, а юный бандеровец дядя Фёдор сбежал от своего отца имперца!👀
Хохлы, ну Вы и уроды... такую чушь нести про наше Ппостоквашино!🤬
The channel appears to be part of the broader information war that has developed following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The Kremlin has paid Russian TikTok influencers to push propaganda, according to a Vice News investigation, while ProPublica found that fake Russian fact check videos had been viewed over a million times on Telegram. Artem Kliuchnikov and his family fled Ukraine just days before the Russian invasion. Telegram was co-founded by Pavel and Nikolai Durov, the brothers who had previously created VKontakte. VK is Russia’s equivalent of Facebook, a social network used for public and private messaging, audio and video sharing as well as online gaming. In January, SimpleWeb reported that VK was Russia’s fourth most-visited website, after Yandex, YouTube and Google’s Russian-language homepage. In 2016, Forbes’ Michael Solomon described Pavel Durov (pictured, below) as the “Mark Zuckerberg of Russia.” On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts.
from ru
