Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 663 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50
Warning: file_put_contents(): Only 8192 of 8855 bytes written, possibly out of free disk space in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 E_Bash_news | Telegram Webview: e_bash_news/9005 -
😱Парнишка порвал себе рот …шаурмой, т.к. был очень голоден и сильно торопился
23-летний москвич заскочил с друзьями перекусить в одно из заведений в Савёловском районе. Бедолага заказал себе большую шаурму, еле дождался, пока её приготовят, и попытался съесть всё и сразу. Парнишка так торопился, что умудрился надорвать себе уголки рта.
😱Парнишка порвал себе рот …шаурмой, т.к. был очень голоден и сильно торопился
23-летний москвич заскочил с друзьями перекусить в одно из заведений в Савёловском районе. Бедолага заказал себе большую шаурму, еле дождался, пока её приготовят, и попытался съесть всё и сразу. Парнишка так торопился, что умудрился надорвать себе уголки рта.
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives?
from ru
