Это разве не Ирка, сестра Игоря Климкина? Она ведь поначалу с Грековым мутилась, а теперь, получается, замуж за этого гриба-боровика замшелого вышла? Прикольно! Дедок Арцыбашев ее у Грекова отбил или тот ему ее подарил? Чудны дела твои .... Интересно, какой из двух Игорьков через нее все наворованное ранее Арцыбашевым прибрать к своим рукам решил?
Это разве не Ирка, сестра Игоря Климкина? Она ведь поначалу с Грековым мутилась, а теперь, получается, замуж за этого гриба-боровика замшелого вышла? Прикольно! Дедок Арцыбашев ее у Грекова отбил или тот ему ее подарил? Чудны дела твои .... Интересно, какой из двух Игорьков через нее все наворованное ранее Арцыбашевым прибрать к своим рукам решил?
Such instructions could actually endanger people — citizens receive air strike warnings via smartphone alerts. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. In February 2014, the Ukrainian people ousted pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych, prompting Russia to invade and annex the Crimean peninsula. By the start of April, Pavel Durov had given his notice, with TechCrunch saying at the time that the CEO had resisted pressure to suppress pages criticizing the Russian government. The message was not authentic, with the real Zelenskiy soon denying the claim on his official Telegram channel, but the incident highlighted a major problem: disinformation quickly spreads unchecked on the encrypted app. In a statement, the regulator said the search and seizure operation was carried out against seven individuals and one corporate entity at multiple locations in Ahmedabad and Bhavnagar in Gujarat, Neemuch in Madhya Pradesh, Delhi, and Mumbai.
from ru
