Vielleicht hätte Stephan Kühn, Dresdens zuständiger, um nicht zu sagen: politisch Verantwortlicher, seinen Fokus mehr auf sein "Fachgebiet" richten sollen.
Immerhin wurde die Tage ein Mann verurteilt, der ihn einen "grünen Faschisten" schimpfte.
Man könnte letzteres wohl als Pyrrhussieg bezeichnen, oder?
Vielleicht hätte Stephan Kühn, Dresdens zuständiger, um nicht zu sagen: politisch Verantwortlicher, seinen Fokus mehr auf sein "Fachgebiet" richten sollen.
Immerhin wurde die Tage ein Mann verurteilt, der ihn einen "grünen Faschisten" schimpfte.
Man könnte letzteres wohl als Pyrrhussieg bezeichnen, oder?
BY Fidels Recherchen - Lokaljournalismus aus Dresden
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. The regulator took order for the search and seizure operation from Judge Purushottam B Jadhav, Sebi Special Judge / Additional Sessions Judge. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts.
from ru
