Не очень понятно, что именно это должно проиллюстрировать. Скажем, в 2020-м Трампу не хватило до победы «всего» 103 тыс. голосов. Преимущество Байдена в Пенсильвании тогда составило 80,6 тыс. голосов, в Джорджии — 11,8, в Аризоне — 10,5. Взяв эти три штата, Трамп победил бы на выборах. Но какое это имеет значение? Суть колеблющихся штатов во многом как раз в том, что перевес победителя в них зачастую невелик.
Не очень понятно, что именно это должно проиллюстрировать. Скажем, в 2020-м Трампу не хватило до победы «всего» 103 тыс. голосов. Преимущество Байдена в Пенсильвании тогда составило 80,6 тыс. голосов, в Джорджии — 11,8, в Аризоне — 10,5. Взяв эти три штата, Трамп победил бы на выборах. Но какое это имеет значение? Суть колеблющихся штатов во многом как раз в том, что перевес победителя в них зачастую невелик.
The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. Pavel Durov, Telegram's CEO, is known as "the Russian Mark Zuckerberg," for co-founding VKontakte, which is Russian for "in touch," a Facebook imitator that became the country's most popular social networking site. Stocks closed in the red Friday as investors weighed upbeat remarks from Russian President Vladimir Putin about diplomatic discussions with Ukraine against a weaker-than-expected print on U.S. consumer sentiment.
from ru
