Соглашусь с токсичным ФСБшником, что отрабатывал отравление Навального: "по-другому никак не могло быть". Увы. Деды в маразме дают приказы, игнорируя реальность. В итоге провалы, смерти, позор.
Соглашусь с токсичным ФСБшником, что отрабатывал отравление Навального: "по-другому никак не могло быть". Увы. Деды в маразме дают приказы, игнорируя реальность. В итоге провалы, смерти, позор.
BY Инфобомба
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. "There are several million Russians who can lift their head up from propaganda and try to look for other sources, and I'd say that most look for it on Telegram," he said. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback.
from ru
