В Белоруссии несистемная оппозиция излишне агрессивно восприняла новость про мониторинг чатов. Выборы президента там намечены на 2025 год. Прошлые обернулись масштабными протестами координируемыми в мессенджерах.
Сомневаюсь, что после этого подобные программы для Белорусии ноу хау 🙂 Как минимум есть старые добрые СОРМы 👨💻
*Министерство внутренних дел Белоруссии признало экстремистским формированием группу граждан, объединенных интернет-ресурсами "Реальная Беларусь"
В Белоруссии несистемная оппозиция излишне агрессивно восприняла новость про мониторинг чатов. Выборы президента там намечены на 2025 год. Прошлые обернулись масштабными протестами координируемыми в мессенджерах.
Сомневаюсь, что после этого подобные программы для Белорусии ноу хау 🙂 Как минимум есть старые добрые СОРМы 👨💻
*Министерство внутренних дел Белоруссии признало экстремистским формированием группу граждан, объединенных интернет-ресурсами "Реальная Беларусь"
Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. In February 2014, the Ukrainian people ousted pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych, prompting Russia to invade and annex the Crimean peninsula. By the start of April, Pavel Durov had given his notice, with TechCrunch saying at the time that the CEO had resisted pressure to suppress pages criticizing the Russian government. It is unclear who runs the account, although Russia's official Ministry of Foreign Affairs Twitter account promoted the Telegram channel on Saturday and claimed it was operated by "a group of experts & journalists." On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed.
from ru
