Любому автору приятно, когда его тексты читают и цитируют, что говорить.
Но когда авторские страдания и боль на женские темы разделяют такие значимые феминистские каналы, как Проклятая амбивалентность, испытываешь особенные чувства.
Дорогие коллежанки, сердечно благодарю вас за опору и поддержку, а также за акценты, которые вы выделили ☘️🩵💜
Любому автору приятно, когда его тексты читают и цитируют, что говорить.
Но когда авторские страдания и боль на женские темы разделяют такие значимые феминистские каналы, как Проклятая амбивалентность, испытываешь особенные чувства.
Дорогие коллежанки, сердечно благодарю вас за опору и поддержку, а также за акценты, которые вы выделили ☘️🩵💜
BY Женская доля
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
"We as Ukrainians believe that the truth is on our side, whether it's truth that you're proclaiming about the war and everything else, why would you want to hide it?," he said. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government.
from ru
