Со вчерашнего дня к круглосуточном дежурствам в посёлке Врангель приступили специалисты охотнадзора и дирекции по охране животного мира на КамАЗе, подготовленном для вахтовой работы. Для работы у охотнадзора также имеются тепловизоры для ночного наблюдения, фальшфейеры, шумовой гранатомёт и дистанционный инъектор в случае необходимости обездвиживания тигра.
Со вчерашнего дня к круглосуточном дежурствам в посёлке Врангель приступили специалисты охотнадзора и дирекции по охране животного мира на КамАЗе, подготовленном для вахтовой работы. Для работы у охотнадзора также имеются тепловизоры для ночного наблюдения, фальшфейеры, шумовой гранатомёт и дистанционный инъектор в случае необходимости обездвиживания тигра.
A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. Founder Pavel Durov says tech is meant to set you free If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from ru
