Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 9991 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Русская Община ZOV | Telegram Webview: obshina_ru/10682 -
Александр Бастрыкин распорядился навести Закон и Порядок на территории Челябинской области. Очевидное сопротивление жителей строительству рынка с мигрантами и вырубке гектаров леса заметили на самом высоком уровне.
Спасибо Александру Ивановичу, что есть еще на кого рассчитывать.
И теперь даже те угрозы, которые поступают сегодня активистам из числа местных жителей, выглядят агонией, а не серьезной опасностью. Но об этом расскажем позже. Там сейчас работает Русская община.
Александр Бастрыкин распорядился навести Закон и Порядок на территории Челябинской области. Очевидное сопротивление жителей строительству рынка с мигрантами и вырубке гектаров леса заметили на самом высоком уровне.
Спасибо Александру Ивановичу, что есть еще на кого рассчитывать.
И теперь даже те угрозы, которые поступают сегодня активистам из числа местных жителей, выглядят агонией, а не серьезной опасностью. Но об этом расскажем позже. Там сейчас работает Русская община.
In December 2021, Sebi officials had conducted a search and seizure operation at the premises of certain persons carrying out similar manipulative activities through Telegram channels. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. But Telegram says people want to keep their chat history when they get a new phone, and they like having a data backup that will sync their chats across multiple devices. And that is why they let people choose whether they want their messages to be encrypted or not. When not turned on, though, chats are stored on Telegram's services, which are scattered throughout the world. But it has "disclosed 0 bytes of user data to third parties, including governments," Telegram states on its website. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from ru
