На Солотчинском шоссе в Рязани рабочие решили укладывать асфальт во время снегопада. Недавно в Рязани в снегопад косили газон.
Машинывстали в пробку. Движение затруднено в обе стороны. О дороге для объезда рязанские власти не подумали. Ну а что - подумаешь, снегопад. Работаем дальше.
На Солотчинском шоссе в Рязани рабочие решили укладывать асфальт во время снегопада. Недавно в Рязани в снегопад косили газон.
Машинывстали в пробку. Движение затруднено в обе стороны. О дороге для объезда рязанские власти не подумали. Ну а что - подумаешь, снегопад. Работаем дальше.
The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts.
from ru
