😈Нет дела о банкротстве — не беда, ведь субсидиарка есть всегда! Новый выпуск.
Сегодня обсуждаем привлечение к субсидиарной ответственности в ситуации, когда дела о банкротстве нет. Да, так тоже можно, при чем как по основаниям Закона о банкротстве, так и по корпоративным.
Чем опасно прекращение дела о банкротстве или исключение общества из ЕГРЮЛ по решению налоговой для контролирующих лиц? Все ли потеряно для кредитора, если невозможно ввести процедуру банкротства из-за недостаточности средств даже на ее сопровождение? Ответы на все эти вопросы в новом выпуске.
😈Нет дела о банкротстве — не беда, ведь субсидиарка есть всегда! Новый выпуск.
Сегодня обсуждаем привлечение к субсидиарной ответственности в ситуации, когда дела о банкротстве нет. Да, так тоже можно, при чем как по основаниям Закона о банкротстве, так и по корпоративным.
Чем опасно прекращение дела о банкротстве или исключение общества из ЕГРЮЛ по решению налоговой для контролирующих лиц? Все ли потеряно для кредитора, если невозможно ввести процедуру банкротства из-за недостаточности средств даже на ее сопровождение? Ответы на все эти вопросы в новом выпуске.
The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Anastasia Vlasova/Getty Images The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. As a result, the pandemic saw many newcomers to Telegram, including prominent anti-vaccine activists who used the app's hands-off approach to share false information on shots, a study from the Institute for Strategic Dialogue shows.
from ru
