This is a trick question I use to reveal how little people know about Eugenics.
The fact of the matter is that killing people with down syndrome has absolutely nothing to do with eugenics for two very obvious reasons.
Firstly, the primary cause of the disorder is the age of the mother, not genetics.
Secondly, more than 99% of downs do not reproduce and ~75% are born sterile. The way to target the disorder on a genetic level would be to prevent normal adults who have latent genes from reproducing.
The fact that most people fail to answer this question correctly is evidence that many people support positions they do not understand and cannot rationalize.
This is a trick question I use to reveal how little people know about Eugenics.
The fact of the matter is that killing people with down syndrome has absolutely nothing to do with eugenics for two very obvious reasons.
Firstly, the primary cause of the disorder is the age of the mother, not genetics.
Secondly, more than 99% of downs do not reproduce and ~75% are born sterile. The way to target the disorder on a genetic level would be to prevent normal adults who have latent genes from reproducing.
The fact that most people fail to answer this question correctly is evidence that many people support positions they do not understand and cannot rationalize.
BY Phad's Channel
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
"We're seeing really dramatic moves, and it's all really tied to Ukraine right now, and in a secondary way, in terms of interest rates," Octavio Marenzi, CEO of Opimas, told Yahoo Finance Live on Thursday. "This war in Ukraine is going to give the Fed the ammunition, the cover that it needs, to not raise interest rates too quickly. And I think Jay Powell is a very tepid sort of inflation fighter and he's not going to do as much as he needs to do to get that under control. And this seems like an excuse to kick the can further down the road still and not do too much too soon." For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching. He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content.
from ru
