❗️В презентации и дискуссии примут участиеАлександр Фридрихович Филиппов — доктор социологических наук, профессор, руководитель Центра фундаментальной социологии НИУ ВШЭ, главный редактор журнала «Социологическое обозрение», переводчик книги и автор послесловия и Олег Васильевич Кильдюшов — научный сотрудник Центра фундаментальной социологии НИУ ВШЭ.
📎Для участия в мероприятии необходимо зарегистрироваться по ссылке.
Лекция предполагает обсуждение следующих вопросов: Как Сократ приходит к новому образу жизни? В чём эта жизнь состоит? Превосходит ли она другие образы жизни? Каковы трудности избранного Сократом подхода?
❗️В презентации и дискуссии примут участиеАлександр Фридрихович Филиппов — доктор социологических наук, профессор, руководитель Центра фундаментальной социологии НИУ ВШЭ, главный редактор журнала «Социологическое обозрение», переводчик книги и автор послесловия и Олег Васильевич Кильдюшов — научный сотрудник Центра фундаментальной социологии НИУ ВШЭ.
📎Для участия в мероприятии необходимо зарегистрироваться по ссылке.
Лекция предполагает обсуждение следующих вопросов: Как Сократ приходит к новому образу жизни? В чём эта жизнь состоит? Превосходит ли она другие образы жизни? Каковы трудности избранного Сократом подхода?
#opencall #дляпортфолио
BY БЛОКНОТ ФИЛОСОФА
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Russian President Vladimir Putin launched Russia's invasion of Ukraine in the early-morning hours of February 24, targeting several key cities with military strikes. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. The last couple days have exemplified that uncertainty. On Thursday, news emerged that talks in Turkey between the Russia and Ukraine yielded no positive result. But on Friday, Reuters reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin said there had been some “positive shifts” in talks between the two sides.
from ru
