Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 8642 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Политрук 2.0 | Telegram Webview: pltrk/19779 -
Ровно год, получается. И — с именным посвящением, обратим 🔼🔼🔼 внимание.
Как мы (не чураясь мистицизма "Розы Мира") любим повторять, "Жругр — очень трудный эгрегор, он жрёт тех, кто к нему инвольтирует. Есть лишь один способ с гарантией уберечь от атак Жругра тылы — не иметь их".
Ровно год, получается. И — с именным посвящением, обратим 🔼🔼🔼 внимание.
Как мы (не чураясь мистицизма "Розы Мира") любим повторять, "Жругр — очень трудный эгрегор, он жрёт тех, кто к нему инвольтирует. Есть лишь один способ с гарантией уберечь от атак Жругра тылы — не иметь их".
In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough Following this, Sebi, in an order passed in January 2022, established that the administrators of a Telegram channel having a large subscriber base enticed the subscribers to act upon recommendations that were circulated by those administrators on the channel, leading to significant price and volume impact in various scrips. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from ru