🇰🇿🇰🇬 Кстати, очень верную точку зрения высказали коллеги.
Почему не привлекают к ответственности канал Airan, который причастен к ситуации с нашим певцом? По факту это провокация, на которую они вывели его намеренно.
Он, скорее всего, и не понимал, к чему приведет сказанное, но действия структуры, подконтрольной «Каспи Банку», этому поспособствовали.
Тут просто можно было бы одним финтом получить признание значительной прослойки кыргызского населения, если бы за него хоть немного заступились и начали борьбу с казахской структурой.
🇰🇿🇰🇬 Кстати, очень верную точку зрения высказали коллеги.
Почему не привлекают к ответственности канал Airan, который причастен к ситуации с нашим певцом? По факту это провокация, на которую они вывели его намеренно.
Он, скорее всего, и не понимал, к чему приведет сказанное, но действия структуры, подконтрольной «Каспи Банку», этому поспособствовали.
Тут просто можно было бы одним финтом получить признание значительной прослойки кыргызского населения, если бы за него хоть немного заступились и начали борьбу с казахской структурой.
The channel appears to be part of the broader information war that has developed following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The Kremlin has paid Russian TikTok influencers to push propaganda, according to a Vice News investigation, while ProPublica found that fake Russian fact check videos had been viewed over a million times on Telegram. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup.
from ru
