🚫При закрытии ипотеки россияне допускают ряд ошибок. Чаще всего это внесение неверной суммы последнего платежа, отсутствие контроля за снятием обременений с жилья и нежелание брать у банка справку о выплате ипотеки.
🚫При закрытии ипотеки россияне допускают ряд ошибок. Чаще всего это внесение неверной суммы последнего платежа, отсутствие контроля за снятием обременений с жилья и нежелание брать у банка справку о выплате ипотеки.
Anastasia Vlasova/Getty Images "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice.
from ru