group-telegram.com/region15_ru/32540
Create:
Last Update:
πΠ£ΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠΉ Π±Π΅Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡ Π² Π‘Π΅Π²Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠ³ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΡΠΌΠ° ΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ» 0,6 %
@region15_ru
BY Region15.ru
Share with your friend now:
group-telegram.com/region15_ru/32540
View MORE
Open in Telegram
Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, itβs taken as a given that itβll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as βISISβ app of choice,β saying that the platformβs real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie MarΓ©chal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights.
from ru