📝حبیب رحیم‌پور: با طرحی از سیاست روبرو هستیم که مدام شما را دعوت به خانواده می‌کند بدون اینکه امکان خانه دار شدن به شما بدهد، خب معلوم است که این طرح شکست می‌خورد.
📝اگر بتوانی فرم سیاست را عطف به عدالت انقلابی کنی!امکانات زندگی برای عموم را باز می‌کنی؛ ولی اگر نکنی خب همین می‌شود[که الآن هست]. عده‌ای روز به روز خانه‌هایشان بزرگ‌تر می‌شود، عده‌ای دیگر هم [به عکس] از وسط شهر باید بروند پایین شهر، بعد از آنجا بروند حاشیه شهر، بعد هم بروند شهر دیگری.
📝امر انقلابی آن چیزیست که بتواند [این] نظم ضدِ زندگی را به همبزند.
📝حبیب رحیم‌پور: با طرحی از سیاست روبرو هستیم که مدام شما را دعوت به خانواده می‌کند بدون اینکه امکان خانه دار شدن به شما بدهد، خب معلوم است که این طرح شکست می‌خورد.
📝اگر بتوانی فرم سیاست را عطف به عدالت انقلابی کنی!امکانات زندگی برای عموم را باز می‌کنی؛ ولی اگر نکنی خب همین می‌شود[که الآن هست]. عده‌ای روز به روز خانه‌هایشان بزرگ‌تر می‌شود، عده‌ای دیگر هم [به عکس] از وسط شهر باید بروند پایین شهر، بعد از آنجا بروند حاشیه شهر، بعد هم بروند شهر دیگری.
📝امر انقلابی آن چیزیست که بتواند [این] نظم ضدِ زندگی را به همبزند.
At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. "We as Ukrainians believe that the truth is on our side, whether it's truth that you're proclaiming about the war and everything else, why would you want to hide it?," he said. These administrators had built substantial positions in these scrips prior to the circulation of recommendations and offloaded their positions subsequent to rise in price of these scrips, making significant profits at the expense of unsuspecting investors, Sebi noted. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp.
from ru
