Мы столкнулись с серьёзной проблемой — нам не хватает крупной суммы, чтобы продолжать свою работу. На этот раз мы точно не справимся без вашей поддержки.
В течение месяца мы должны собрать 125000€. Поддержите нас!
Пожертвуйте любую сумму на работу команды «Эха» и расскажите об этом тем, кто тоже может помочь.
Если вы хотите принять участие в срочном сборе для «Эха», но вам не подходит этот способ, напишите нам в бот обратной связи @echocontact_bot.
Мы столкнулись с серьёзной проблемой — нам не хватает крупной суммы, чтобы продолжать свою работу. На этот раз мы точно не справимся без вашей поддержки.
В течение месяца мы должны собрать 125000€. Поддержите нас!
Пожертвуйте любую сумму на работу команды «Эха» и расскажите об этом тем, кто тоже может помочь.
Если вы хотите принять участие в срочном сборе для «Эха», но вам не подходит этот способ, напишите нам в бот обратной связи @echocontact_bot.
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from ru
