تحديث – قوّات مجلس الرقة العسكري التابع لقوّاتنا تنتهي من تمشيط قرى وبلدات السبخة، معدان وزور شمر في ريف الرقة الجنوبي بعد تعرضها لهجوم من قبل خلايا يُشتبه انتمائها لتنظيم داعش الإرهابي، حيث أعادت قوّاتنا الأمن والاستقرار للمنطقة وفرار تلك الخلايا باتجاه البادية.
المركز الإعلامي لقوّات سوريا الديمقراطية ١٩ كانون الأول ٢٠٢٤
تحديث – قوّات مجلس الرقة العسكري التابع لقوّاتنا تنتهي من تمشيط قرى وبلدات السبخة، معدان وزور شمر في ريف الرقة الجنوبي بعد تعرضها لهجوم من قبل خلايا يُشتبه انتمائها لتنظيم داعش الإرهابي، حيث أعادت قوّاتنا الأمن والاستقرار للمنطقة وفرار تلك الخلايا باتجاه البادية.
المركز الإعلامي لقوّات سوريا الديمقراطية ١٩ كانون الأول ٢٠٢٤
BY SDF_PRESS - المركز الإعلامي
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. As such, the SC would like to remind investors to always exercise caution when evaluating investment opportunities, especially those promising unrealistically high returns with little or no risk. Investors should also never deposit money into someone’s personal bank account if instructed. The SC urges the public to refer to the SC’s I nvestor Alert List before investing. The list contains details of unauthorised websites, investment products, companies and individuals. Members of the public who suspect that they have been approached by unauthorised firms or individuals offering schemes that promise unrealistic returns
from ru
