Зашел сейчас на YouTube и как на машине времени перенесся в осенний вечер 24 ноября 1952 года. В тот день в БЗК отмечали 80-летние со дня рождения Леонида Витальевича Собинова. В финале вечера на сцену вышли 15 (!) теноров Большого театра, включая Козловского с Ивановским, и все вместе спели Песню певца из оперы Аренского «Рафаэль». Страстью и негою сердце трепещет…
Зашел сейчас на YouTube и как на машине времени перенесся в осенний вечер 24 ноября 1952 года. В тот день в БЗК отмечали 80-летние со дня рождения Леонида Витальевича Собинова. В финале вечера на сцену вышли 15 (!) теноров Большого театра, включая Козловского с Ивановским, и все вместе спели Песню певца из оперы Аренского «Рафаэль». Страстью и негою сердце трепещет…
On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. In a message on his Telegram channel recently recounting the episode, Durov wrote: "I lost my company and my home, but would do it again – without hesitation." The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. In February 2014, the Ukrainian people ousted pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych, prompting Russia to invade and annex the Crimean peninsula. By the start of April, Pavel Durov had given his notice, with TechCrunch saying at the time that the CEO had resisted pressure to suppress pages criticizing the Russian government. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from ru
