خداقوت به مردمی که با گامهایشان دشمن را به خشم آوردند. برای حفظ انقلاب، باید انقلاب کرد؛ انقلابهای اقتصادی، اجتماعی، علمی و فرهنگی. جامعه ۱۴۰۰ زیر سیستم دارد و تا در اغلب اینها انقلاب نشود، جامعه اصلاح نخواهد شد. علیه نهادها و علوم لیبرال و برای تحقق آرمان‌های امام باید قیام کرد.
خداقوت به مردمی که با گامهایشان دشمن را به خشم آوردند. برای حفظ انقلاب، باید انقلاب کرد؛ انقلابهای اقتصادی، اجتماعی، علمی و فرهنگی. جامعه ۱۴۰۰ زیر سیستم دارد و تا در اغلب اینها انقلاب نشود، جامعه اصلاح نخواهد شد. علیه نهادها و علوم لیبرال و برای تحقق آرمان‌های امام باید قیام کرد.
On Telegram’s website, it says that Pavel Durov “supports Telegram financially and ideologically while Nikolai (Duvov)’s input is technological.” Currently, the Telegram team is based in Dubai, having moved around from Berlin, London and Singapore after departing Russia. Meanwhile, the company which owns Telegram is registered in the British Virgin Islands. What distinguishes the app from competitors is its use of what's known as channels: Public or private feeds of photos and videos that can be set up by one person or an organization. The channels have become popular with on-the-ground journalists, aid workers and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who broadcasts on a Telegram channel. The channels can be followed by an unlimited number of people. Unlike Facebook, Twitter and other popular social networks, there is no advertising on Telegram and the flow of information is not driven by an algorithm. Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy." Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts.
from ru
