The funny thing is, I know who many of the evil little dank Reich anons are, and many know me. The BigReformed shamers want you to believe it’s all so diabolical.
But the shamers that are screeching the loudest about those laser-eyed anon rascals are the same ones that would utterly ruin you with great pleasure if given the opportunity.
Of course they’d try & shield it with gallantry — e.g. “for the fidelity of the gospel” or something like that.
The fact is simple: It’s a power & control game. This is a discourse & messaging war. And weak men delight in using open shame as a weapon when they’re being out flanked.
The funny thing is, I know who many of the evil little dank Reich anons are, and many know me. The BigReformed shamers want you to believe it’s all so diabolical.
But the shamers that are screeching the loudest about those laser-eyed anon rascals are the same ones that would utterly ruin you with great pleasure if given the opportunity.
Of course they’d try & shield it with gallantry — e.g. “for the fidelity of the gospel” or something like that.
The fact is simple: It’s a power & control game. This is a discourse & messaging war. And weak men delight in using open shame as a weapon when they’re being out flanked.
BY The Beacons Are Lit
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. As such, the SC would like to remind investors to always exercise caution when evaluating investment opportunities, especially those promising unrealistically high returns with little or no risk. Investors should also never deposit money into someone’s personal bank account if instructed. This provided opportunity to their linked entities to offload their shares at higher prices and make significant profits at the cost of unsuspecting retail investors. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp.
from ru
