Warning: file_put_contents(aCache/aDaily/post/thetruth_or/-3217?single" target="_blank" rel="noopener" onclick="return confirm('Open this link?\n\n'+this.href);">Библеист Б. Эрман про влияние вавилона на библейский текст</a> <br/>2. <a href="https://t.me/thetruth_or/3221?single" target="_blank" rel="noopener" onclick="return confirm('Open this link?\n\n'+this.href);">Археолог Л. Вулли про присутствие вавилонских мифов в библейских текстах </a><br/>3. <a href="https://t.me/thetruth_or/3231-): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Правда или... | Telegram Webview: thetruth_or/3237 -
Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. Soloviev also promoted the channel in a post he shared on his own Telegram, which has 580,000 followers. The post recommended his viewers subscribe to "War on Fakes" in a time of fake news. For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from ru
