Ми вдячні за кожен донат і особливо за поширення постів: ви не уявляєте яке це має значення, адже кожне поширення - це доступ до ще однієї крихітної або великої інформаційної бульбашки, яка б вона не була, там є нові люди, які матимуть 5 гримнів і кинуть їх на цей збір.
Ми вдячні за кожен донат і особливо за поширення постів: ви не уявляєте яке це має значення, адже кожне поширення - це доступ до ще однієї крихітної або великої інформаційної бульбашки, яка б вона не була, там є нові люди, які матимуть 5 гримнів і кинуть їх на цей збір.
Lastly, the web previews of t.me links have been given a new look, adding chat backgrounds and design elements from the fully-features Telegram Web client. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from ru
