Чудес не бывает, и тут не будет. Постановление Правительства РФ от 17.12.2024 № 1810, не содержит изменений в постановление #400 регулирующее вопросы определения и установления предельных индексов платы граждан. Таким образом, учесть МРОТ возможно, только если предельник в конкретном муниципальном образовании не выбран. В противном случае, в протоколе заседания КТЦ или РЭК (в зависимости от субъекта) будет записано, что возросшие расходы когда-то вернуться РСО (надеемся и верим). Очередная супер реформа от блока ЖКХ ФАС России. Потом в Сочи, это преподнесут как протянутую отрасли ЖКХ руку! Расходимся девочки, не на что тут смотреть! 😈
Чудес не бывает, и тут не будет. Постановление Правительства РФ от 17.12.2024 № 1810, не содержит изменений в постановление #400 регулирующее вопросы определения и установления предельных индексов платы граждан. Таким образом, учесть МРОТ возможно, только если предельник в конкретном муниципальном образовании не выбран. В противном случае, в протоколе заседания КТЦ или РЭК (в зависимости от субъекта) будет записано, что возросшие расходы когда-то вернуться РСО (надеемся и верим). Очередная супер реформа от блока ЖКХ ФАС России. Потом в Сочи, это преподнесут как протянутую отрасли ЖКХ руку! Расходимся девочки, не на что тут смотреть! 😈
On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Individual messages can be fully encrypted. But the user has to turn on that function. It's not automatic, as it is on Signal and WhatsApp. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from ru
