Турки получили от США плюшки в виде обещания самолётов и признания С-400 взамен на то, чтобы пошатать нам нервы в Сирии.
В итоге какое-то время будет тяжко, садыки будут огребать, потом наши перекинут сил АК с неликвидным для СВО РЭБом (99% что тапочники летают на стандартных частотах) и какими-нибудь мавиками со сбросами и 1001-й прошивкой, тапочники немного огребут от нашего СВОшного опыта и все ± стабилизируется.
Турки получили от США плюшки в виде обещания самолётов и признания С-400 взамен на то, чтобы пошатать нам нервы в Сирии.
В итоге какое-то время будет тяжко, садыки будут огребать, потом наши перекинут сил АК с неликвидным для СВО РЭБом (99% что тапочники летают на стандартных частотах) и какими-нибудь мавиками со сбросами и 1001-й прошивкой, тапочники немного огребут от нашего СВОшного опыта и все ± стабилизируется.
Короче, все норм будет
BY Янсен | Z
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
"There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. As a result, the pandemic saw many newcomers to Telegram, including prominent anti-vaccine activists who used the app's hands-off approach to share false information on shots, a study from the Institute for Strategic Dialogue shows. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. It is unclear who runs the account, although Russia's official Ministry of Foreign Affairs Twitter account promoted the Telegram channel on Saturday and claimed it was operated by "a group of experts & journalists."
from us
