Башар заранее прикупил в Москва-Сити недвижимости на 40 млн дол. Это характеризует его с хорошей стороны. Значит, он умный человек, а не отмороженный идиот. Прекрасно понимал, чем все закончится и соломку себе постелил. Другое дело, что он остальных сирийцев забыл предупредить, что он побольше выжмет из них бабок и свалит.
Башар заранее прикупил в Москва-Сити недвижимости на 40 млн дол. Это характеризует его с хорошей стороны. Значит, он умный человек, а не отмороженный идиот. Прекрасно понимал, чем все закончится и соломку себе постелил. Другое дело, что он остальных сирийцев забыл предупредить, что он побольше выжмет из них бабок и свалит.
BY Димитриев
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. The picture was mixed overseas. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index fell 1.6%, under pressure from U.S. regulatory scrutiny on New York-listed Chinese companies. Stocks were more buoyant in Europe, where Frankfurt’s DAX surged 1.4%. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from us
