اْلــلَا مُبَــالــٰاة 😪 Íñdìffêrēñçé

اْلــلَا مُبَــالــٰاة 😪 Íñdìffêrēñçé

اْلــلَا مُبَــالــٰاة 😪 Íñdìffêrēñçé Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements.
اْلــلَا مُبَــالــٰاة 😪 Íñdìffêrēñçé from sa

اْلــلَا مُبَــالــٰاة 😪 Íñdìffêrēñçéأنتَ مدِين ِللخَيبة الأولىٰ
لِلصَدمة الأولىٰ،أنتَ مدِين
لِكُل الأشْياءٰ التي إمْتصَتْ
مِنك شِعُور الألم في البِداية،
ثُم صَنَعتْ فِيكَ اللاٰمُبَالاٰةْ
بِبَقيّة الهَزائم

Open Telegram