🇷🇺💪🏻💥Горящий Т-80 ВСУ: оператор БпЛА из "ВОЛЖСКОЙ БРИГАДЫ" уничтожил танк точным ударом
➖ В районе Новогродовки оператор БПЛА с позывным "Мак" из "Волжской бригады", сражающейся в составе группировки "Центр", поразил танк ВСУ, предположительно Т-80, с помощью FPV-дрона. ➖ С первого точного попадания в люк наводчика-оператора танк загорелся, что подтверждено кадрами объективного контроля.🇷🇺💪
🇷🇺💪🏻💥Горящий Т-80 ВСУ: оператор БпЛА из "ВОЛЖСКОЙ БРИГАДЫ" уничтожил танк точным ударом
➖ В районе Новогродовки оператор БПЛА с позывным "Мак" из "Волжской бригады", сражающейся в составе группировки "Центр", поразил танк ВСУ, предположительно Т-80, с помощью FPV-дрона. ➖ С первого точного попадания в люк наводчика-оператора танк загорелся, что подтверждено кадрами объективного контроля.🇷🇺💪
On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. These administrators had built substantial positions in these scrips prior to the circulation of recommendations and offloaded their positions subsequent to rise in price of these scrips, making significant profits at the expense of unsuspecting investors, Sebi noted.
from sa